Path: netcom.com!netcomsv!amd!amdahl!rtech!pacbell.com!sgiblab!darwin.sura.net!howland.reston.ans.net!news.cac.psu.edu!news.pop.psu.edu!barr
From: barr@pop.psu.edu (David Barr)
Newsgroups: alt.config
Subject: So You Want to Create an Alt Newsgroup
Date: 30 Nov 1993 15:03:02 GMT
Organization: Penn State Population Research Institute
Lines: 204
Expires: 18 Dec 1993 15:03:01 GMT
Message-ID: <alt-creation-guide_754671781@pop.psu.edu>
NNTP-Posting-Host: bosnia.pop.psu.edu

Version: $Id: alt-creation-guide,v 1.4 1993/11/30 13:57:26 barr Exp barr $

	There are no Guidelines or Rules for creating alt groups.
There is no one "in charge" of the alt hierarchy.  The key to creating a
successful alt newsgroup depends only on convincing the thousands of
news administrators across the globe to carry your newsgroup.  Here are
some tips that will help you achieve this.

	This article is based on common-sense and real-life
experience.  This is not an attempt to codify rules or guidelines
for alt, but merely a guide to help people get the most out of alt.

	This guide is split onto three parts.  The first part covers
some technical background as to why alt is the way it is, and
how it fits into the larger Usenet.
	The second section lists many common reasons proposed alt
groups are rejected.  Some are technical, and some are philosophical.
	The third section includes some miscellaneous suggestions
on making your alt group achieve the widest audience possible.

1. Technical background
=======================

What is alt?
	Contrary to popular belief, "alt" is not named necessarily
because it carries "alternative" topics.  Back during the dawn of the
modern Usenet, it was decided that newgroups should be created by
following a clearly defined set of "Guidelines", involving formal
discussions and a voting procedure.  There was a significant number of
people who felt that there should be a provision for a place where
people could create groups without having to go through any discussion
or votes.  Thus alt was born.  It is a hierarchy that is "alternative"
to the "mainstream" (comp,misc,news,rec,soc,sci,talk) hierarchy.

Votes?  Did someone say vote?
	Let me repeat.  There are NO VOTES in alt.  Period.  If you
want to gather an "opinion poll" for your own purposes to see how
popular the group will be, great.  Do NOT POST votes to alt.config.
Every few months someone says "hey I've got a great idea for a newsgroup
alt.widget, what do you think?".  Someone responds "I vote yes!", causing
a chain-reaction ofposts to alt.config, lasting for days or weeks.
These serve no purpose but to annoy readers of alt.config, and to
distribute dozens of messages across the globe that should have ended
up in someone's mailbox instead.  Please, use a "Followup-To: poster"
in your header and gather votes by e-mail.  Then post a summary after
a week or two.

News Administrators:
	Alt newsgroups are not created everywhere all at once.  Each
site has a news administrator, who ultimately decides whether to carry
a new newsgroup on that site.  Nevertheless, for simplicity, many sites
automatically honor all requests to create a new group and (by default)
ignore all requests to remove groups.  Newsadmins can be very busy
people who don't need the hassle of hand-approving every group.  Thus,
alt newsgroups are not necessarily created in a way that is fair, or
just, or logical.  That's life.

Newsgroup Name Components:
	A newsgroup name, e.g. "alt.foo.bar-bar.baz", is made up of a
series of dot-separated "components", in this case "alt", "foo",
"bar-bar", and "baz".  The articles in newsgroups are usually stored in
your machine's directory hierarchy.  Basically, every component of the
newsgroup name corresponds to a directory or subdirectory of the same
name, and that subdirectory typically takes up 512 or more bytes on the
machine all by itself.  Also, since accessing any group requires
eventually reading the contents of the directory, if there are lots
of subdirectories off of "alt", access for any single article in
alt can theoretically suffer a performance hit.  Also, some newsreaders
are hierarchically organized.  To read "alt.folklore.computers", you
select "alt", then select "folklore", then "computers".  If there are
lots of needless top-level components, then this is more work for the
person reading news.

Newsgroup Longevity:
     There are some people who insist that once an "alt"
newsgroup is created, it can never be destroyed, no matter what.
These people make sure that whenever someone tries to remove a
group, it gets re-created.  Even if these people were not on the
net, occasional mistakes (in such situations as people setting
up new sites) can cause almost-dead newsgroups to get revived
everywhere.  Thus, "alt" groups are effectively immortal, at
least for the foreseeable future; they can't be removed or even
re-named.  Alt groups never die, they just fade away.


2. Common Reasons Proposed Groups are Rejected
==============================================

o Component Too Long:
  Some systems cannot handle a newsgroup name component that is
  longer than 14 characters.  Thus alt.fan.bgcrisis (length of
  "bgcrisis" = 8) instead of alt.fan.bubblegum-crisis (length
  of "bubblegum-crisis" = 16).  This restriction is becoming less
  and less critical, as current news software handles this
  better, but the restriction has been around so long that
  there are many that will reject a group on principle.

o Useless Components:
  If you take away components at the end of the name, you should
  not be left with a directory name that is unlikely to have
  any other newsgroups in it.  Thus alt.fan.bg-crisis instead of
  alt.fan.bubble.gum.crisis (other "alt.fan.bubble" newsgroups?).
  In other words, don't use a dot as a word separator, use a dash.

o Joke/Revenge/Shock Group:
  Because of newsgroup longevity (see below), newsgroups which
  are started just to get people to laugh at the name, and/or to
  get revenge on some specific person, and/or to shock people,
  are discouraged.  They tend to generate a flurry of articles
  (sometimes) for a maybe even a month or two, but quickly die.

o ".word.word.word" Ending:
  The first group was "alt.swedish.chef.bork.bork.bork".  Since then,
  dozens of lookalike groups have been created.  This was kind of funny
  at first (5 years ago) but the joke is old.

o Top-Level Mess:
  There are dozens of newsgroups named alt.<foo>, where <foo> is
  a very specialized subject.  Wouldn't it be nice if there were
  some classification scheme for them?  Well, there is; you can
  name your group alt.food.<foo>, or alt.sport.<foo>, or whatever.

o Big Seven Move Threat:
  Because of newsgroup longevity, many newsadmins will actually
  *oppose* creation of a group if you suggest you may want to move it
  to the "big seven" hierarchy (rec, soc, talk etc.) sometime in the
  future.  Try to create it there first.  On the other hand, other
  newsadmins will then suggest you try out an alt group before trying
  to create a "big seven" group.

o Extremely Limited Interest:
  Yes, alt groups can be created for subjects that the "big seven"
  hierarchy wouldn't touch, but if the discussion you propose is
  extremely faddish, or silly, or of extremely limited or regional
  interest, some newsadmins may oppose it.

o Not Proposed in alt.config:
  Some newsadmins will not create any groups that haven't been
  discussed in alt.config.  Posting your idea for a new group to
  alt.config is a very good idea anyway.  Someone may have already
  created the group you proposed, or something similar.  They may also
  point you to a mailing list that you might not have known about.
  They also will probably tell you if your group is poorly named.

o "But They Started It" Considered Irrelevant:
  The fact that someone else created a newsgroup with a bad name, which
  was accepted by your newsadmin for some reason, doesn't make other
  newsadmins look more kindly on your doing the same.

o "But No One's Forced To Accept It" Considered Irrelevant:
  Sure, no newsadmin has to accept your group if they don't want to;
  but the newsadmins are going to curse you for the hassle of having to
  decide on it -- when it gets created and every time it gets
  re-created.  Also consider the consequence on the readers of the
  newsgroup.  If their articles are only getting to a small minority of
  sites, is it even worth it?

o "But All These People Agree" Considered Irrelevant:
  You might get 20 people who haven't read this FAQ to agree that your
  newsgroup is a good idea.  This isn't likely to convince anyone
  either, if any of the reasons above apply.


3. Some Positive Suggestions
============================

o Propose your group in alt.config.  Listen to constructive
  criticisms.

o Look for an appropriate place in existing alt hierarchies.
  alt.binaries, .books, .comp, .culture, .games, .lang, .music,
  .politics, .religion, .sex, .society, and .tv are all fairly
  well accepted.  Keep top-level hierarchies as broad as broad
  as possible.

o Make the component names a real hierarchy, rather than a
  message to news readers.

o Spell the newsgroup name correctly.

o And please, try using existing Big Seven newsgroups, alt newsgroups,
  or mailing lists before insisting on creating an "alt" group.

o If you group is related to current events, then create the
  group under alt.current-events.*.  You will get greater success.

o If your group contains binaries or other large files, create it under
  alt.binaries.*.  Newsadmins will thank you for it, as they typically
  expire these groups more quickly to compensate for their large size.


Once you decide that it's time to create your newsgroup, contact your
local news administrator.  If you are a news administrator, the consult
your news software documentation on how to issue a control message.
Alternatively you can modify someone else's control message if you
forget all the syntax.  Just look in the "control" newsgroup.  One
thing that is nice is to include a "For your newsgroups file:" line in
the body of the message, to automatically have news software enter a
description for the newsgroup.  Many newsreaders use this.


Credits:
Based on previous work by jamie@cs.sfu.ca (Jamie Andrews)
"Common Reasons Why People Oppose Proposed Alt Newsgroups"

